Dr Lal’s admission will only add to the mounting furore over the melting glaciers assertion, which the IPCC was last week forced to withdraw because it has no scientific foundation.
“
| — |
Glacier scientists says he knew data had not been verified | Mail Online Sawickipedia: So glad the “science” is so good, that they don’t have to lie to make their case for AGW. Oh wait, they did lie. What a mess. [Again my skepticism has nothing to do with whether there is climate change it has to do with the fallacy of humans and how our arrogance and self-importance can get the best of us. We need sustainable energy because there’s a limited supply of carbon stored in the ground - that is indisputable. The sooner we move away from carbon, the better, if it helps w/ what some believe to be AGW great, but right now that part of the debate is too messy to be relied on IMO.] |
